Security concerns

 The clarification was much needed and perhaps could have come sooner .

the DG  Isper  monday press conference was helpful in addressing some key concerns  regarding the scope and objective of Azim i Itehkam even thoughts it remains to be seen whether the briefing will have its intended results the  only complaint was that it should not have been left to the ISPR to set the record straights it had been the government responsibility to mange national political consensus on Azm i Istekam and it clearly failed in this regard .

talking reprsentatives from local media DG ispr L t gen ahmad sharif clarified  that the initiative was always a broad based.integrated counterterroism  campaign.

Not a entail mass displacements or social  disruptions a operating  zarb i Azb he assured explaining   that it only evisions the coordinate implementations of updated anti  terrorism policies on which political consensus had already been reached.

A point  raised by the DG ispr seemed particularly pertinent lt gen sharif pointed out that any successful  CT strategy requried equal supports from the once an area had been cleared threats by the armed forces it was the civilian leadarship.responsiblity to rebulid and transfer control  back to local however build and transfer control not kept up which allowed terrorism to re emerage forcing .

rebuild and transter control  back to local however build  and transfer had  not kept up which  allowed terrorism to  re emerge forcing security personal to stay engaged in a clear and hold cycle in problems areas .

this continued engagemnets of armed forces had given rise to resentment among local populations .he acknowledged  this .seems  to be a very valid issue that must be a very valid.